Comments on: 2 Charges Formally dropped

By: Jeffrey

Jeffrey — Sat, 25 Aug 2007 06:50:41 +0000

Justice don’t be too concerned about the evidence presented this week. It’s nothing compared to what they will drag out during trial. We don’t know that Joe is trying to cut a deal and turn on Harlow. There is speculation sure and guesses, but that is all it is at this point. Angel of Truth of whoever is now writing this blog says that they want to go to trial, and they want all the real story out. So we may as well accept that as the plan in place until further notice. Besides Harlow is a gentle person and kind soul who will get a chance to explain away all of this right.

By: Ron Eicholtz

Ron Eicholtz — Sat, 25 Aug 2007 04:12:34 +0000

Listen Everyone,

Joe is too sweet to flip on Harlow. He loves him too much.

By: Justice

Justice — Sat, 25 Aug 2007 00:05:32 +0000

I am not saying whether harlow is innocent or guilty but I think everyone around here needs a reality check.

http://handjtrial.blogspot.com/2007/08/prelim-day-two-late-updates.html

This is getting ugly for Harlow and there is apparently a lot of evidence that is working against him.

What’s his high priced lawyer doing to help Harlow??

I am VERY concerned about all this evidence that was presented today by the prosecution. Harlow had better wake up before Joe hands him over to the prosecution on a silver platter.

Thoughts?
Justice

By: ...

... — Fri, 24 Aug 2007 21:48:07 +0000

… quite strange indeed: The least relevant charges are dropped - and folks see this as good news.

Still the major ones remain for official investigation.

Sorry to have to say this.

By: Ron Eicholtz

Ron Eicholtz — Fri, 24 Aug 2007 21:32:36 +0000

I’m sure that if Joe doesn’t flip and take a plea, all other charges will be dropped before trial.

Be strong–you will be out of jail very soon. Just tell the truth!

By: Peter Everhard

Peter Everhard — Fri, 24 Aug 2007 19:30:17 +0000

Since Grant Roy apparently testified about the alleged theft and destruction of Cobra Video master discs and model identification materials, and the Magistrate STILL dismissed all of the buglary charges against Cuadra and Kerekes, The Magistrate either did not buy Roy’s testimony on the thefts or, the Magistrate simply dismissed all of Grant Roy’s testimony out of hand.

Based on information and belief, Grant Roy was also a defendant to the Lawsuit Bryan Kocis filed in Federal Court in San Diego (either or both in his personal capacity and as a member of LSG Media).

It appears that all of the defendants to the Kocis lawsuit in San Diego filed answers which argued that Lockhart’s contract with Bryan Kocis was void and unenforceable as the contract was against public policy (i.e., the Lockhart/Kocis Contract was essentially a contract for sexual services - prostitution).

So, how did Cuadra and Kerekes get the idea in their heads that Lockhart was legally bound to Bryan Kocis/Cobra Video? see our blog at http://www.tempcity.com/bitchless/index.php?showtopic=15076 Sean Lockhart Harlow Cuadra and Motives for Murder

The apparent dismissal of Grant Roy’s testimony and the fact that contracts for sex are void and unenforceable should mean that The State has to come up with a new and improved “motive” by trial time.

By: Michael

Michael — Fri, 24 Aug 2007 19:09:15 +0000

well at least some good news for now.

By: J James

J James — Fri, 24 Aug 2007 15:17:40 +0000

It’s been pointed out that the prosecutor’s didn’t even present much of a case regarding the burglary charges at the hearing…so it isn’t as if the defense team won a victory. That is more like winning by default.

By: Nep

Nep — Fri, 24 Aug 2007 07:03:47 +0000

Thanks for the info
that is good news

By: V.J.

V.J. — Fri, 24 Aug 2007 03:52:51 +0000

As pc already posted, no big surprise those charges were dropped - they were the lesser of all the charges against these two.