Harlow Cuadra Online

We have heard all of the voices, and the comments posted behind the voices, some we like some we dont, there isnt much that any of us can say about peoples opinions, I would ask that we try to refrain from being so graphic in our posts. Some of you seem to think that you can post whatever you feel like posting even threats, these are uncalled for. We all have our opinions and we would all like to express them, but this is totallly unnecessary to go this far.

Joe has started his own blog, www.josephkerekesonline.com if any of you would like to write to him his address is posted on there.

For all of you that have wrote to Harlow and have sent him books and letters we thank you for your continued support! This is going to be a long drawn out process that will take some time to be figured out, and during this process, it would be great for Harlow to have the continued support from you.

Offically on Sept 5th, 2007 Harlows auction site goes up and will be auctioning some of his personal items off to the highest bidder, we wish you all happy bidding and hope for the best on the items being sold on his auction site. Please check it out as we will have various items on there for sale.

For all of you folks with the running imaginations, let us clarify some things for you, there are no deals for Harlow or Joe, there haven’t been any deals for Harlow or Joe, and Harlow nor Joe will be taking any deals, there are way to many loop holes with the prosecutions case, this will show in the up coming months. Then there is the burglary and the conspiracy to commit burglary being dropped, this is a good thing for the defense, ( as some of you dont understand) the burglary and the conspiracy to commit burglary are mitigating factors for the death sentence, this means this was a victory for the defense whether any of you think so or not.
Grants testimony is not as solid as the prosecution wants us to believe it is, see the article on tempcity and you will see what we are talking about, it is common knowledge that Brent and Grant where in legal litigation with Brian over a contract dispute, a contract that was not enforceable! Now think if Grant and Roy had not gone to the police telling there story ( and i mean story) then the police would of had them in custody right now, they had motive with out a doubt, and any jury would find this to be true. Brent on the other hand has caused some much turmoil in other peoples lives over the last few years including Brian, that he would be very hard to believe unless he pulled the feel sorry for Brent syndrome on the stand. It is amazing that when the police had a perfect motive for the crime and they just over looked the people lying to them. Could it be that Brent really is that good of an actor? Seems he must be for the act that he put on for the prosecution, they sure ate it up and ran with it and just totally over looked Brent and Grant. This will not be for long. Brent and Grant were into some things with Brian that had them caught up in an investigation that no one wants anyone to know about. Well that is the reason everyone wants Harlow and Joe just to take a deal , so that all of this won’t come out at the trial, well get real folks, it will all be coming out at trial, there will be no deals for the defense, not Harlows or Joes. The motive was to great for this…..
Now lets get to what the coroner stated when he testified, that the wound started on the right side of the neck and ran to the left side of the neck with the deepest part of the wound on the left side of the neck , almost severing the head from the body, ok so lets take a look at this, standing in front of Brian you would slash in a downward position and the wound would not be as large on the left side of the neck, so that leaves us to believe that the neck wound was done from behind him with the knife running from the right side to the left side of neck, of couse where the deepest part of the wound was found. Now in order to get that good of a cut from the right side to the left side you would have to be left handed To date Harlow and Joe are right handed and have always been right handed. So to sum it up, who’s the lefty?, Robert Wagner? Brent?, Grant?, I am sure someone knows out there! There are alot more things to come out that will have these same issues with the prosecutions case, look for them in the near future.
And for those of you that are so narrow minded that you cant think past Harlow and Joe’s guilt, please remove yourself from this blog, this is not a publlic forum this a private run blog! If you don’t like our opinions then please go elsewhere, believe me there are plenty of other blogs out there that would be more then willing to have your comment posted on there blog. Thank you for your interest but no thank you for the comments. To all of Harlow and Joes well wishers, we thank you all for your support!

The continuation of Harlow and Joe’s Preliminary Hearing convened at 1:05 PM on Thursday, August 23, 2007.

First on the witness stand yesterday was Grant Roy of San Diego, CA. The majority of Grant’s testimony centered on a conversation between himself, Peter Pan, Harlow and Joe, that occurred on Saturday, April 28, 2007. This conversation took place at Black Beach, which is a nude beach near La Jolla. According to Grant, both Harlow and Joe spoke openly of the meeting with and murder of Bryan Kocis… even stating that Harlow brought up the subject. Grant claims Harlow described sharing a bottle of wine with Bryan. He went on to testify that Harlow described items in the house, including a plasma television, expensive stereo equipment, and model contracts and release forms that were waiting for him. Grant also testified that Harlow went on to say that the doorbell rang and that when Bryan went to answer it, he was stumbling from the wine he had drunk. Grant then explained that Harlow made the comment “that was it”. Grant also stated that Harlow made the comments that it “went really quick” and that Bryan “never saw it coming”. Grant also went on to say that Harlow described an upstairs bedroom were Peter Pan had stayed as well as Bryan’s Rolex.

Grant went on to explain that when asked what they did with the stolen property, both Harlow and Joe stated they had watched the master tapes and then incinerated everything because it was “too hot”.

Under cross examination, Grant explained that while there were other people present at Black Beach, there was no one else in earshot during this conversation. He also stated that the conversation had been recorded and that he had been cooperating with the authorities. Grant was asked if he thought it was unusual to be speaking about the homicide, and responded, “No its not”. When asked if Harlow stated, “I killed Bryan,” Grant replied “No”. When asked if Harlow said, “I started the fire” he again replied “No”. Grant also admitted that he did not ask Harlow and Joe why they came to Pennsylvania, how they got to Pennsylvania, what times the conversation and murder occurred, how long they stayed in Pennsylvania, why they took the items, or how and when the items were destroyed. He also stated he had no advance knowledge of Harlow and Joe’s plan to go to Pennsylvania and that he had never been to Bryan’s house.

He also stated that he had reviewed the tape and the transcripts at the State Trooper’s bar-racks before his testimony. Despite the defense attorneys’ best efforts, the Judge did not permit for the tape to be played during the hearing.

Grant spent a total of one hour and 13 minutes on the stand.

The next witness was Trooper Brian Murphy, who has 13 years experience with the Pennsyl-vania State Police. He was asked to read his qualifications into record. Trooper Murphy stated that he had visited the crime scene. He advised that a laptop computer was found in the living room, computer towers were found in the basement, and multiple external storage devises were found in the dining room, where it was apparent that other computer towers had been present. At the prosecutions request, he defined what an I.P. address is and what a Webmaster is.

Trooper Murphy explained that Bryan’s Webmaster forwarded copies of model applications, photos, and e-mails to the police. He also explained that e-mail records were obtained from both AOL and Yahoo!

The court was shown copies of two model applications in the name “Danny Moilin”. Several of the attached photos were shown, as well as most of the e-mails collected that showed com-munication between Bryan and “Danny”. He testified that the Danny Moilin account on Yahoo! was set up by someone using an I.P. address assigned to Harlow’s Cox Communications account. He also went on to testify that many of them also came from a computer connected to an air card that was registered to Harlow. He also testified that the “Danny Moilin” account was only active for a few days. There were a total of about “3 dozen e-mails” most of which were shown in court.

During cross examination, Trooper Murphy did state that there was no way to tell where the computer using the mobile air card was physically located, since the cell tower information is not retained by the service provider. He also indicated that there is no way he can tell who was actually using the computer when the e-mails were sent. He also was unable to testify who set up the account with Yahoo! since it is a free account and also had no way of knowing who knew of the account and its password. Trooper Murphy also testified that to the best of his knowledge, none of the items reported as missing from Bryan’s home were seized during the raid on Harlow and Joe’s home. Trooper Murphy provided login records from Yahoo! that show that two different e-mail accounts were logged into from Harlow’s mobile air card at the time of the homicide. He indicated that e-mails might have been sent from the computer, but that he did not have the relevant records with him at court.

Trooper Murphy stepped down at 4:53 PM.

The next and final witness of the day was Corporal Leo Hannon of the Pennsylvania State Po-lice. He gave testimony that a “box cell phone” or “throw away cell phone” was purchased. The first call from this phone was connected via a cell tower in Virginia Beach. A map was displayed showing the all the cell towers that the phone had connected with. He testified that these towers roughly followed the I-64/I-95 route to Wilkes Barre from Virginia Beach. There were a total of three cell towers in the Wyoming valley that the phone connected to.

Corporal Hannon also testified to the fact that Harlow rented a car from Enterprise in Virginia Beach. A copy of the contract was shown. He also had a tape played recorded at Superior Pawn & Gun shop in Virginia Beach that showed Harlow and Joe buying a gun, ammunition, range membership, and a knife the day before the homicide. Corporal Hannon also testified to the registration card from the Fox Ridge Inn that was shown in court on Monday.

He testified that the theft charges against Harlow and Joe were solely based upon the tape that Grant Roy had testified about.

Corporal Hannon stated that the rental car was not searched until about a month after the homicide. He was also present at the February 10, 2007 raid on Harlow and Joe’s home. He stated that cameras and camera equipment was seized during the raid and that two of the cameras were of the exact same model as those listed as missing from Bryan’s house. He testified that the serial numbers on these cameras were “obliterated”. When asked to clarify this term, he said, “forcibly removed.” He also stated that for the purposes of the investigation, “Danny Moilin” does not exist. He went on to testify that when first speaking with Grant Roy about the taped conversation, Grant was able to provide “non-public information” that he claimed to have received from Harlow and Joe.

Under cross-examination, Corporal Hannon admitted there was no proof of who purchased the box phone. He also admitted there was no way to tell when the serial numbers were removed from the cameras. He did testify that samples were “seized” from the rental vehicle. He also stated that no false information was given on the car rental application or on any of the required fire arms paperwork filled out at the gun shop. He went on to state that there was no evidence that Harlow was trying to hide who he was and that he used his own credit card.

Corporal Hannon stepped down from the stand at 6:42 PM.

Closing arguments were given between 6:54 PM and approximately 7:25 PM. Both sets of defense attorneys went through each individual charge and gave their legal opinions why and how the state had not met the burden of proof for each.

The prosecutor then gave his closing argument explaining how the state had proved their case.

Judge Tupper rendered his verdict at 7:26 PM. He bound over all charges on both defendants for trial, with the exception of Burglary and Conspiracy to Commit Burglary.

While yesterday’s testimony and evidence was much less favorable to Harlow and Joe, the good news is the dropping of the two charges each. The defense attorneys made it quite clear that there is a long road ahead and that the hearing had gone much as they expected. Both Harlow and Joe were very active in assisting their attorneys during both days of the hearing.

The next big event in this case will be the Arraignment in front of an Upper Court Judge, which has not yet been scheduled and will probably be a few months down the road.

The preliminary hearing ended this evening with the outcome of the burglary and the conspiracy to commit burglary being dropped off the charge list, this is great for the defense and show the defense that the states case is not as solid as previously thought. If the states case had been as solid as they announced it to be in the affidavid, then non of the charges would of been dropped today, please check back shortly for a detailed account of todays court procedings.

As most of you are aware, the first day of Harlow and Joe’s preliminary hearing was held yesterday, August 20, 2007 at 9:00 AM. The first day of the hearing went very well. There were a total of eleven witnesses.

The first witness was the Deputy Coroner, Bill Lisman, who is not a medical doctor. He testified as to the location and condition of Bryan’s body. Photos from the crime scene were shown during his testimony. He also gave his observations of the condition of the living room.

The Coroner, Dr. John Consalvo, testified next. He provided descriptions for the photos from the autopsy that were shown.  He stated that the head and fingers were so badly burned that dental records had to be used to positively identify the deceased as Bryan Kocis. He explained that there were no drugs found in Bryan’s system and that his blood alcohol level was the ecquiveilent of having consumed two 1-ounce drinks. He was shown a copy of the death certificate and confirmed that it listed the cause of death as “multiple stab wounds”. However, he also testified that the stab wounds were all post-mortem. He indicated that the neck slash, which nearly severed the head, was the cause of death. He testified that the knife used was straight edged, but that no measurements were taken to determine the depth of the stab wounds or any other characteristics of the knife.

The next witness was the manager of the Fox River Inn. He testified that a registration card had been filled out on January 23, 2007 in Joe’s name. He also testified that a photo ID would have been requested and that he had the person write down the ID number. He testified that the room was paid in cash for two nights and that no credit card imprint would have been taken. He also stated that he could not remember the person who registered and would not be able to recognize him. He testified that he did not receive any reports from the staff about any unusual or bloody items being found in the room and that nothing was reported missing from the room.

Then a neighbor who lived up the street from Bryan was called to the stand. He testified that he was walking his dog around 7:35 PM and saw a gray SUV parked in the driveway of Bryan’s house. He testified that it was not parked where he normally saw cars parked, but did not write down the license plate. He stated he did not see the SUV drive away and that he saw nothing unusual or suspicious while walking in front of Bryan’s house. He then testified that he remembers hearing the fire trucks drive by and looked out his front window and saw Bryan’s house in flames. He stated he recalled this being around 8:15 PM.

The next witness was a girl visiting the Bryan’s neighbor. She testified that she saw a vehicle back out of Bryan’s driveway. She could only say that it was “light colored” and was “bigger than my car… maybe a truck or SUV”. She did not see the occupants of the vehicle. She also testified about being alerted to the fire and leaving the neighbors house.

Then BoyBatter’s own Justin testified. His testimony was mostly about Joe and Harlow’s relationship and the business. He testified about his time working with BoyBatter. He also gave testimony about phone conversations and e-mails he had with both Joe and Harlow about trying to work with Peter Pan. He was unable to definitely identify who wrote the e-mails. He did testify that he had never heard Bryan’s name until he it was on the news after the murder. While he did testify that Cobra video was considered to be a rival, he also stated that there were many other companies (“thousands”) in the business and that they were all potentially rivals.

At this point the hearing was recessed for lunch and reconvened at 1:00 PM in the afternoon.

First up after lunch was the Fire Chief. He testified that he was actually at the firehouse when the dispatch call was received at 8:35 PM that night and that the firehouse is only about 1/3 of a mile from the crime scene. He indicated the first firefighters arrived on scene at 8:37 PM. He gave testimony about fighting the fire and sending teams in to search for any people in the house. He testified that once the body was discovered, he followed normal procedure and called in the Fire Marshall. He did state that he entered the premises briefly and then secured the scene while awaiting the Fire Marshall’s arrival.

The Fire Marshall then took the stand and gave testimony, accompanied by more photos, of his arrival around 10:15 PM. He then testified about his investigation. He indicated that he found no natural or accidental causes for the fire. He also indicated that he did not find any evidence of accelerants. He testified that he found evidence of a pillow and paper materials at the origin point. He also stated that he found evidence that the front door was at least partially open at the time of the fire. He did testify that the two smoke detectors in the house were found in locations other than where their mounting brackets were. He did not check them to see if they had batteries or if they worked and he did not collect them in to evidence. He also stated he did not collect any samples of the burned materials. He testified that he determined the cause of the fire was arson. He was unable to provide an estimate of the time the fire started and had not performed any tests to determine how quickly the fire would have started and spread to the level it did.

The next witness was a representative from the insurance company who testified briefly that he had processed the insurance claim on Bryan’s house. He stated that because the repair costs would exceed the value of the house, it was considered a “total loss”. He did state he received a report of items missing from the house.

Bryan’s father, Michael, then took the stand. He gave testimony about the items missing from the property. He was also questioned about when he was last in the house. He also stated that Bryan’s house was demolished last Friday at his request.

The final witness for the day was Robert Wagner, who stated he was “Bryan’s best friend”. He provided additional testimony about the missing items. He also testified that Bryan had told him about an appointment the night of Wednesday, January 24, 2007 with a new model. He said Bryan did send him photos of the model, but did not tell him the model’s name. He indicated that Harlow was the model in the photos. He testified that he had been at Bryan’s house the weekend before the crime and had been working on updating Bryan’s computer records. He stated he had a phone conversation with Bryan around 6:30 PM on the night of the crime. He also described the application process Bryan used for “fresh blood” (new models). He indicated that Bryan was a very private person, almost to the point of being a recluse.

Court adjourned at 4:00 PM with the hearing being continued until 1:00 PM on Thursday, August 23, 2007.

For those of you keeping score, the prosecution so far has proved that there was a murder, that there was an arson that someone checked into a hotel, that a car was in Bryan’s driveway and that the car left before the fire was reported. They have also proved that things were reported as missing from Bryan’s house and that someone made an appointment with Bryan by sent him pictures of Harlow.

Stay tuned for further updates.

Some have asked of my daily doings here, well the day starts off with breakfast very early in the am, some much needed sleep after my carb filled breakfast, a nap of sorts, and then around eight I get up in my cell, I am allowed out of my cell for two hours a day, to shower and use the phone. There is not much that I can do in the two hour period, I am then in my cell all day I receive my lunch and dinner, to fill the time I exercise and I read alot, the books that have been sent to me are great. I have been reading on a regular basis. My time that I have left is for writing to friends and family, and my supporters, I seem to enjoy this part of the day, it is a time when i can get away for a few and write what I really think and feel. I am very anxious and excited about the hearing on the 20th, I am hoping that some information will come out that will help our case, and possibly the District Attorneys office will do as they said in an earlier interview and make some more arrests in this matter, we can only hope for this to happen soon. My belief is that this is coming soon and I just need to patiently wait. My Days to say the least are very long. I have sat and wondered what will eventually happen, at this point I have not a clue and wonder even more what will eventually come to unravel out of this whole thing.
I would like for everyone to know that I appreciate the donations, the canteen funds, the books and the letters that everyone sends to me. I cant express the admiration I have for the people who write to me. I now know how kind and real people can really be. In this time of need I have found that there are people who just care, and dont want anything in return. They themselves are people with good hearts, who should have a special place in heaven. I know there has been alot of controversy about all of this, and the people who support me, I just want for everyone to know there are no plea deals in the future, I want the hole story out, and the truth to be told! This is the only way I can be set free from all of this and know that everyone knows the truth. The time will come when the trial will start and in this long process alot of information will come out and be either fact or fiction, that will be up to the jurors to decide. I know that there will be a jury of my peers and they will come to a conclusion either way. People should understand that whatever the outcome all I have ever wanted was the truth to be told! This will be done, so please be patient.
I want to clarify a few things for everyone, the house was given back to us by the State of Virginia becuase they believe there is no equity in it, which is fine, they are allowed to have there opinion of the value, as well as we are. The house may not bring us much but it will bring something hopefully, only time will tell this. I can at this point only be thankful for what i have received, there are no sorrows for what has been lost only a lesson well learned. There have been some questions as to the payment for the attorneys in Virginia Beach, my attorney Scott Flax of Tavss & Fletcher was paid in advance for his services, by a close family friend, and Joe’s Attorney, James Brice was paid for by family of his. There was no donation of $5000.00 from or to anyone in this matter, the State did not take any money on the issue with the house , and both my attorney and Joe’s attorney were paid for well before this was noted on the internet that someone put $5000.00 in the right hands. Well there were no hands to put it in that were not already paid for there services. So as for this claimed money dont know where or what happened to it!
I am currently on the advise of counsel doing any interviews at the present time, maybe in the future my attorney will allow them to be done.
This blog was written partially by Harlow Cuadra and Angel of Truth

First of all, I would like to thank all of you that have written me since I arrived in Pennsylvania. I have also enjoyed the birthday cards.Â

Unfortunately, due to the persistent media coverage, the warden has decided to keep this jailbird all cooped up. Simply for the sake of my safety.

To my family and friends - Please be patient. The time allotted for personal calls is verry short. For now I need to budget my phone time between webmasters and lawyers. Don’t worry though; I will do my best to contact everyone. Time be damned.Â

I will also start responding to your letters and cards soon. Trust me, I have been wanting to do this since day 1.

To the media (news channels, magazines, papers, etc…) – I will be issuing statements and doing interviews soon. Please bear with me. There is a huge rock on my shoulder that I will soon toss off.

Sorry for taking the site down for a few days. It had turned a little nasty and waaay off into negative never-never land. Its only fare that I have comments moderated until I am released, simply because I am not in the position where I can defend myself against them.

I really need your help and support, whether it is financial or moral, during these hard times.

I understand that the current situation is crappy. I feel terrible just thinking of it, even worse speaking of it.

It is only temporary!

I will be with you again!

Even though I am in complete isolation for 22 hours of the day, I am holding strong!

Fear will not be my guide!

Thank you all for your letters, donations, and positive comments.

Thank you for stopping by to check out the site.

Thank you for caring!

God Bless all of you!Â

hrc

Harlow has requested that we thank all of you for the donations that you have sent to either his legal defense fund or to his canteen fund. He has been expressing his appreciation in letters to those who write to him. He has been spending his day between reading and writing letters to pass the time by. Some of you have sent him some books and he is very happy that you went to so much trouble to give him some reading material to make the time go by so quickly. He is looking forward to the preliminary hearing, because once this occurs this means that things will move forward. We would all hope in a timely fashion, but the system will move the way it set up too. The Preliminary hearing will be the state representing a portion of there case, we do not believe and neither does Harlow that his attorney will be doing anything but alot of listening and taking of notes for the future trial. We were advised by both Harlow and Joe that there attorneys have advised them that the preliminary hearing will be a two day hearing. Harlow and Joe have also made it common knowledge that neither of them will be doing any kind of plea agreement at the Preliminary hearing. The have both assured me that they will be taking this to trial.
Angel of Truth

Just as we said in the earlier post the preliminary hearing is postponed til the 20th. It is kind of amazing that we posted this very early this am and now I see some bloggers have come back to post it and did not refer to our blog telling them that this would be cancelled, now , now , just cause you didnt get it first doesnt mean to not give credit where credit is due! You would be suprised at who the state is calling for witness’s, but i will leave that up to the other bloggers to post for now, I can give you some hints if you would like?
The reference to Harlow and Joe not having a job, now please they had the oldest profession on earth, so they were not reaping what they sow, they were doing what people asked for and paid for, if there werent people out there looking for escorts then we wouldnt have them, but this is the world we live in and we all have a profession, not matter what it be, no person has the right to beat another down about there profession. ————The issue with Damons story about the 5000.00 dollars is, who did he pay the judge, the district Attorney, Harlows Attorney or Joes Attorney, well none of them got a penny of the money Damon claimed to have,( Damon has never shown proof to anyone of having the money, so post where the money went and show it you like to show everything else, faxes, emails etc… well let’s see it) so who did he give it to, some Congress person that Damon smeared all over his site? Doubtful! Some poor District Attorney in Virginia Beach, Again Doubtful! Or the Judge, even more Doubtful! So who did the money go to? You claim it helped get the house, well not according to all the players in this!
Angel of Truth

Just so that everyone does know the state of Virginia has decided to give the house back to Harlow and Joe. The Document for them to get the house has been signed by both Harlow and Joe, but needless to say they are loosing all of there other property to get back this one thing, the state refused to give them back anything else…… Not a penny of the over 26,585.25 that the state seized that could of went to there attorneys, now think about it if they had done illegal things the state of Virginia they would of prosecuted them to the fullest extent of the law, but instead the State froze all there assets to make sure they had no way to defend there selves….. According to the agreement with the state of Virginia they are forfeiting all of there property but the property located at 1028 Stratem Court, Virginia Beach, Va 23451 , according to the the agreement the state agrees to release the Lis Pendens on the residence at 1028 Stratem Court in the City of Virginia Beach agrees to nonsuit the forfeiture action against the property related to the information filed in CR07-003043 , so there were no criminal charges filed against them but the state took all of there assets that they could of used to pay there attorneys, now how right is this. How would you like it if the state froze all of your assets and they told you they werent gonna get any of them back and they didnt file any charges against you. Now this is the fair , just legal system that we have….
So Harlow and Joe were left with two choices, to use public defenders, and which they both did apply for and Joe went to see about getting the judge to appoint him a public defender and was denied due to the fact he had to many assets, ( this is because the state of virginia had taken the assets but they werent forfeited, due to the fact it would of had to go to a hearing in a virginia court and a judge would of had to forefit all of there assets to the state) this of course never occured. So then they are stuck trying to retain cousel to represent them with no liquid assets cause the state of virginia had a hold on them, but the state of Pennsylvania says you have to much because they havent been forfeited, this is when Harlow gave up on the Public Defenders office in Pennsylvania and and decided to go with a private attorney. Now either they have assets or they don’t, so basically this boils down to the state of Virginia froze everything they had, and the state of Pennsylvania still considered them there assests due to the fact they were not forfeited by the state of Virginia, Makes no common sense, why should the tax payers have to pay for a public defender if they have assets that could be sold and pay for there defense, why should the state , any state ask for higher taxes if this is what they do to defendants. When a defendant has assets they should be sold for there attorney not let the tax payers take the burden of paying for there defense, as alot of you have said on other blogs, they should of used the public defender , well that would of been nice if they had been allowed to and did not have so many assets that they could not access to pay there own attorneys. So in turn the great state of Virginia decided to take everything for themselves and leave the tax payers of Pennsylvania to foot the bill. Nice! Really Nice!
We will hope that the house will sell for something to help pay anything to the attorneys, anything is better then nothing! El go gettem! You have it! display it ! And show them all!
For everyones information, the post on Damons blog about 5000.00 being placed in the right place is a bold face lie, this was done through the attorneys in Virginia Beach and the state attorney in Virginia Beach and there was nothing to do with any sums of money that Damon had to do with. Damon nor anyone else contributed 5000.00 to this cause or anything else to do with Harlows case!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
—————————————————————————————————————————————————————————–
And for all of you skeptics that believe this preliminary hearing will be on the 16th, well keep waiting we have been advised that the state is having an issue with getting there witness’s together so it is looking like another postponement. We will see when another blogger post the change here in a day or so, as for the tapes for the blacks beach thing, the state of Pennsylvania is preparing to play the full tapes, this hearing is scheduled for two days, so we should be looking at sometime around the 20th to the 24th for the hearing to be rescheduled, keep up with the court docket boys it is going to change quickly.
Angel of Truth