The House / The Preliminary Hearing Postponed Again!
Just so that everyone does know the state of Virginia has decided to give the house back to Harlow and Joe. The Document for them to get the house has been signed by both Harlow and Joe, but needless to say they are loosing all of there other property to get back this one thing, the state refused to give them back anything else…… Not a penny of the over 26,585.25 that the state seized that could of went to there attorneys, now think about it if they had done illegal things the state of Virginia they would of prosecuted them to the fullest extent of the law, but instead the State froze all there assets to make sure they had no way to defend there selves….. According to the agreement with the state of Virginia they are forfeiting all of there property but the property located at 1028 Stratem Court, Virginia Beach, Va 23451 , according to the the agreement the state agrees to release the Lis Pendens on the residence at 1028 Stratem Court in the City of Virginia Beach agrees to nonsuit the forfeiture action against the property related to the information filed in CR07-003043 , so there were no criminal charges filed against them but the state took all of there assets that they could of used to pay there attorneys, now how right is this. How would you like it if the state froze all of your assets and they told you they werent gonna get any of them back and they didnt file any charges against you. Now this is the fair , just legal system that we have….
So Harlow and Joe were left with two choices, to use public defenders, and which they both did apply for and Joe went to see about getting the judge to appoint him a public defender and was denied due to the fact he had to many assets, ( this is because the state of virginia had taken the assets but they werent forfeited, due to the fact it would of had to go to a hearing in a virginia court and a judge would of had to forefit all of there assets to the state) this of course never occured. So then they are stuck trying to retain cousel to represent them with no liquid assets cause the state of virginia had a hold on them, but the state of Pennsylvania says you have to much because they havent been forfeited, this is when Harlow gave up on the Public Defenders office in Pennsylvania and and decided to go with a private attorney. Now either they have assets or they don’t, so basically this boils down to the state of Virginia froze everything they had, and the state of Pennsylvania still considered them there assests due to the fact they were not forfeited by the state of Virginia, Makes no common sense, why should the tax payers have to pay for a public defender if they have assets that could be sold and pay for there defense, why should the state , any state ask for higher taxes if this is what they do to defendants. When a defendant has assets they should be sold for there attorney not let the tax payers take the burden of paying for there defense, as alot of you have said on other blogs, they should of used the public defender , well that would of been nice if they had been allowed to and did not have so many assets that they could not access to pay there own attorneys. So in turn the great state of Virginia decided to take everything for themselves and leave the tax payers of Pennsylvania to foot the bill. Nice! Really Nice!
We will hope that the house will sell for something to help pay anything to the attorneys, anything is better then nothing! El go gettem! You have it! display it ! And show them all!
For everyones information, the post on Damons blog about 5000.00 being placed in the right place is a bold face lie, this was done through the attorneys in Virginia Beach and the state attorney in Virginia Beach and there was nothing to do with any sums of money that Damon had to do with. Damon nor anyone else contributed 5000.00 to this cause or anything else to do with Harlows case!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
—————————————————————————————————————————————————————————–
And for all of you skeptics that believe this preliminary hearing will be on the 16th, well keep waiting we have been advised that the state is having an issue with getting there witness’s together so it is looking like another postponement. We will see when another blogger post the change here in a day or so, as for the tapes for the blacks beach thing, the state of Pennsylvania is preparing to play the full tapes, this hearing is scheduled for two days, so we should be looking at sometime around the 20th to the 24th for the hearing to be rescheduled, keep up with the court docket boys it is going to change quickly.
Angel of Truth
August 8th, 2007 at 9:14 am
thanks for the info
angel of truth
have a good day
August 8th, 2007 at 8:47 pm
HOW CAN YOU SAY THAT ITS NOT FAIR THAT THEY GET NOTHING, THEY DID NOT HAVE REAL JOBS, IT WAS ALL ILLEGAL SEX, AND YOU KNOW WHAT THE BIBLE SAYS…READ IT. YOU REAP WHAT YOU SOW!
August 9th, 2007 at 3:07 am
Oh come on…. Harlow and Joe were about to receive the intergity businessmen award for 2007 in Virginia and the cops ruined it. H and J are innocent and George W. Bush is too gay friendly. PLEEEEEEEEZE FOLKS, WAKE UP!
NEEDLE TIME for H & J AND SAVE $$$$$
August 9th, 2007 at 7:48 am
Your mistake was ever associating with disgusting people like Sean Lockhart or Bryan Kocis in the first place. I wish you good luck in your defense, and if you are truly innocent, I hope that God is on your side. However, by placing yourself with these people… it is hard to see your side of the story…
August 9th, 2007 at 5:34 pm
First and foremost, thanks for the information that you have posted. I like the updates posted on this blog. It seems that a couple comments have slipped in on us even though we had a new beginning. I would like to take the time to comment on what has been said.
First of all if you want to talk about being fair, let’s talk about that just for a moment.
You say the sex they were having was illegal? I think you need to ask yourself a few questions before we go on a rampage about illegal sex.
1) Are you married?
2) Do you have sex?
3) Do you have sex in any position other than the missionary position?
4) Do you have sexual relations with someone of the same sex?
If you have answered yes to some of the above, guess what, you are guilty of a felony in most States. Does not make a difference if you were paid or not, just the point of having sexual relations out of wedlock makes that sexual activity illegal. How cool would it be to see you arrested for a felony and all of your assets frozen and then let’s see what you got to say about being fair just because you had sex with your unwed wife or boyfriend (which ever applies to you) or you where in another position besides the missionary position. If you don’t believe, read the criminal code in your state. Other than posting a comment have you taken the time to research if the Commonwealth of Virginia did act fairly in this case? If so how many people have been accused of illegal activity and how many times has the Commonwealth of Virginia seized all the property? IF YOU HAVE THIS INFORMATION, please post it. If not, take your comments somewhere else. This is a time for relevance and not just someone posting comments to say you reap what you sow. If you want to be fair, get that research done, then we can actually talk about being fair. Lets prove the Commonwealth of Virginia acted fairly in this case. All I want you (or anyone else) to do is actually prove anything you have to say if you are not here for the support of Harlow.
Harlow and Joe about to receive the integrity businessmen award for 2007. Can you point out anywhere this has been stated or implied? I for one have not read this nor is it the point of this blog. This blog was started to support Harlow and provide facts of this case, and everyone out here has taken what ever canard they wanted to prove they are guilty of the crimes they are charged with. First, we need to ask you the same questions that are above, are you guilty of a felony because you have been having sex? If so go to hell. I don’t want a person that has committed a felony telling me anything about anything. You say I support Harlow, you’re right, I do support Harlow. All you have to do is prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Harlow is guilty. Then I would listen to your comments. So get off your ass and let’s get that proof beyond a reasonable doubt posted. Otherwise post your needle comments somewhere else.
I consider Harlow a friend and I’m sick and tired of your bullshit. All the blogs out here have done absolutely nothing to prove anything about this case. They claim they are providing us the truth or unbiased news of this case; however, this has been the worst coverage of any case I have ever read. People seem to take a fact of the case and blow it up into whatever they want it to be, regardless of the truth. Now is a time for relevance. Unless you can prove what you got to say then go somewhere else and post that information, it actually may be welcomed at other sites. It is not welcomed here. Period.
I think it’s funny that there are people reporting on this case that actually claim to be some professional reporter or journalist. There certainly has been no professional activity noted on several of the other blogs and myspace pages out there in internet land talking of this case.
There is someone claiming they sent 5,000 to someone to ensure the return of the house to Harlow and Joe. How ridiculous is that statement alone? Is this person claiming that some how a donation was made to the court to make this happen? This was going to happen regardless of any monies paid to anyone. This was a COURT matter and in the Great Commonwealth of Virginia, there had to be another hearing to dispose of all the property that was seized. Period. Now maybe, just maybe if Harlow and Joe were present at this hearing, they may have needed money to pay an attorney to represent them at this hearing. However that was not the case. They remained in PA and were not present for the VA hearing. So I would actually like to see some proof that this money was sent.
If you cannot post facts, then what’s the point? I think there would be several agencies interested in this information if indeed there was a donation sent to someone.
As speaking of the donation, what kind of person would claim to collect money for someone and then refuse to send it. I would like a list of the donor so I could notify them you misused the money you collected for Harlow and Joe. I know I have read blog after blog about this person, and there is no need to beat a dead horse so to speak. I just want the same to apply to him, if you cannot prove anything you say then shut up and keep your comments on paper; they are not even worth reading on line.
I have never been involved in the adult industry or used an escort. With the stupidity of some people in this industry, I can see why I never wanted to be a part of it. I’m not asking for everyone to support Harlow. But at what point and time can we ask people to at least have the common decency not to post you negative comments here. I don’t really care about what you post anywhere else, just keep your crap where it belongs and this is not the place.
Harlow as always
Stay Strong, Stay Focused and the TRUTH WILL PREVAIL!!
Your friend,
Jake
August 10th, 2007 at 5:12 am
“I think it’s funny that there are people reporting on this case that actually claim to be some professional reporter or journalist. There certainly has been no professional activity noted on several of the other blogs and myspace pages out there in internet land talking of this case. ”
Guess you’ll find out which blog actually made the cut in next month’s OUT Magazine article about the case… and no, it’s not Damon.
August 11th, 2007 at 10:56 pm
The Truth
I would hope it is not him and I guess I will not find out since I dont read OUT Magazine. However, I may get one next month just to see what you are talking about. Thanks.